From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] kallsyms should prefer non weak symbols
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:38:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071204213801.GA8543@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071204131746.ede01c65.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
* Andrew Morton (akpm@linux-foundation.org) wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:35:32 +0000
> Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com> wrote:
>
> > When resolving symbol names from addresses with aliased symbol names,
> > kallsyms_lookup always returns the first symbol, even if it is a weak
> > symbol.
> >
> > This patch changes this by sorting the symbols with the weak symbols
> > last before feeding them to the kernel. This way the kernel runtime
> > isn't changed at all, only the kallsyms build system is changed.
> >
> > Another side effect is that the symbols get sorted by address, too. So,
> > even if future binutils version have some bug in "nm" that makes it fail
> > to correctly sort symbols by address, the kernel won't be affected by this.
> >
> >
>
> I don't understand the reason for making this change.
>
I created a module in LTTng that uses kallsyms to get the symbol
corresponding to a specific system call address. Unfortunately, all the
unimplemented syscalls were all referring to the (same) weak symbol
identifying an unrelated system call rather that sys_ni (or whatever
non-weak symbol would be expected). Kallsyms was dumbly returning the
first symbol that matched.
This patch makes sure kallsyms returns the non-weak symbol when there is
one, which seems to be the expected result.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-04 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 20:35 [-mm PATCH] kallsyms should prefer non weak symbols Paulo Marques
2007-12-04 21:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-05 12:07 ` Paulo Marques
2007-12-04 21:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-04 21:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2007-12-04 21:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-12-04 22:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-12-05 9:37 ` Rusty Russell
2007-12-05 2:05 ` Rusty Russell
2007-12-05 3:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 3:14 ` Andrew Morton
2007-12-05 5:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071204213801.GA8543@Krystal \
--to=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.