From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761478AbYBEUv5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:51:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760583AbYBEUvt (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:51:49 -0500 Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:59753 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760738AbYBEUvr (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:51:47 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:51:41 -0600 From: Paul Jackson To: David Rientjes Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, clameter@sgi.com, mel@csn.ul.ie Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node. Message-Id: <20080205145141.ae658c12.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080202165054.F491.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080202090914.GA27723@one.firstfloor.org> <20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost> <20080205041755.3411b5cc.pj@sgi.com> Organization: SGI X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.12.0; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David wrote: > The more alarming result of these remaps is in the MPOL_BIND case, as > we've talked about before. The language in set_mempolicy(2): You're diving into the middle of a rather involved discussion we had on the other various patches proposed to extend the interaction of mempolicy's with cpusets and hotplug. I choose not to hijack this current thread with my rebuttal, which you've seen before, of your points here. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:51:41 -0600 From: Paul Jackson Subject: Re: [2.6.24-rc8-mm1][regression?] numactl --interleave=all doesn't works on memoryless node. Message-Id: <20080205145141.ae658c12.pj@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20080202165054.F491.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <20080202090914.GA27723@one.firstfloor.org> <20080202180536.F494.KOSAKI.MOTOHIRO@jp.fujitsu.com> <1202149243.5028.61.camel@localhost> <20080205041755.3411b5cc.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: David Rientjes Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, andi@firstfloor.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, clameter@sgi.com, mel@csn.ul.ie List-ID: David wrote: > The more alarming result of these remaps is in the MPOL_BIND case, as > we've talked about before. The language in set_mempolicy(2): You're diving into the middle of a rather involved discussion we had on the other various patches proposed to extend the interaction of mempolicy's with cpusets and hotplug. I choose not to hijack this current thread with my rebuttal, which you've seen before, of your points here. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson 1.940.382.4214 -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org