All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Keld Jørn Simonsen" <keld@dkuug.dk>
To: Jon Nelson <jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net>
Cc: Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org>,
	Linux-Raid <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Awful Raid10,f2 performance
Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:30:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080602183004.GD7990@rap.rap.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cccedfc60806020809t73794ce6w539c6b0d247a264f@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:09:46AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> i can't show you raw write values, but I can show you raw read values
> (after dropping the caches):
> 
> >From dstat, this shows disks sdb, sdc, and sdd values in read (space)
> write format, with the total on the end.
> 
> Thus:
> 
>   70M    0 :  71M    0 :  72M    0 : 213M    0
>   71M    0 :  70M    0 :  69M    0 : 210M    0
>   71M    0 :  73M    0 :  74M    0 : 217M    0
> 
> shows that I'm getting 70+- MB/s on each disk, combined to 210 to 217MB/s.
> These are read values.
> 
> I created a logical volume (50G), dropped the caches again, and issued:
> 
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/raid/test bs=64k
> 
> and got from 100 to 150MB/s sustained write speeds.
> NOTE: this is with a bitmap (internal)
> Without a bitmap (removed for this test), I get a much more consistent
> 130-150MB/s.

70 MB/s sounds like as expected.

> dd reports a mere 70MB/s when complete.
> When using oflag=direct, I get about 100MB/s combined, with a
> "reported" speed of 51.9MB/s.
> Since I'm using 3x drives, my total I/O is going to be about 2x what dd "sees".
> 
> Does that help?

It does not explain a 7 MB/s rate.

the 52 MB/s writing seems as expected - maybe a bit slow, but not very
slow. I do not know is a 3-disk raid10,f2 has specific performance
problems.

You could try the command (md3 being my raid)

blockdev --setra 65536 /dev/md3 

It solved some performance problems for me.

Best regards
keld

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 18:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-02 14:11 Awful Raid10,f2 performance Jon Nelson
2008-06-02 14:53 ` Tomasz Chmielewski
2008-06-02 15:09   ` Jon Nelson
2008-06-02 18:30     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen [this message]
2008-12-15 13:33     ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-15 21:38       ` Neil Brown
2008-12-16  2:47         ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16  4:03           ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-16  4:28             ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 10:10               ` Keld Jørn Simonsen
2008-12-16 15:26                 ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 15:53                   ` Jon Nelson
2008-12-16 22:01                     ` Keld Jørn Simonsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080602183004.GD7990@rap.rap.dk \
    --to=keld@dkuug.dk \
    --cc=jnelson-linux-raid@jamponi.net \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mangoo@wpkg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.