From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nadim khemir Subject: Re: Git.pm Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:58:11 +0100 Message-ID: <200811232058.11321.nadim@khemir.net> References: <200811191856.44252.nadim@khemir.net> <20081120083446.GF10544@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Nov 23 20:58:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L4L6b-0008A2-8j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:58:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754400AbYKWT53 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:57:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758118AbYKWT52 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:57:28 -0500 Received: from mail1.perspektivbredband.net ([81.186.254.13]:56813 "EHLO mail1.perspektivbredband.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758022AbYKWT51 (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 Nov 2008 14:57:27 -0500 Received: from khemir.net (h51bafc0a.c46-01-06.sta.perspektivbredband.net [81.186.252.10]) by mail1.perspektivbredband.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43630940129 for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:57:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from naquadim.khemir.lan (naquadim.khemir.lan [192.168.1.234]) by khemir.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEC91264ECF for ; Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:57:26 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <20081120083446.GF10544@machine.or.cz> Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on firewall Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thursday 20 November 2008 09.34.46 you wrote: > I know it's quite some time since you wrote this mail originally - > have you read the Lea's thread I have recommended? What is your current > plan? > I think the current rough consensus in the Git community is to go with > Lea's design and implementation after extending it with a nice way to > run arbitrary Git commands. This is also desirable since then we can use > her patches to make gitweb use Git.pm. Hi, Yes I read Lea's thread. My current plan is to: - not rush - analyse where the different modules are used and how (and document it) - understand the process of working with the git team - tell my fellow perl developers about this (done, so far very good response) - confer with the people having git related modules (a few) - gather ideas for what nededs to be changed (not much this far) - put a development strategy in place - understand the test mechanisms you've been using so far - pray hard to any helping deity and get real Cheers, Nadim.