From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: Regression in 2.6.28-rc and 2.6.27-stable - hibernate related Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 01:24:29 +0100 Message-ID: <200812050124.29958.rjw@sisk.pl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:53601 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751428AbYLEAY5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:24:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Fabio Comolli Cc: Stefan Richter , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Jay Fenlason , ACPI Devel Maling List , rui.zhang@intel.com (CCing to linux-acpi at Rui's request) On Thursday, 27 of November 2008, Fabio Comolli wrote: > Hi > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Fabio Comolli wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> Actually, yes, Fabio, you can try to revert all of the "ACPI: EC:" commits > >> applied after 2.6.27.4 and retest. > > > > Will do tonight. I see that there are some other "ACPI: EC:" commits > > in 2.6.27.6 and 2.6.27.7. > > > > I'l just compile the ec.c file from 2.6.27.4 in 2.6.27.7 and test if > > the three commits introduced in 2.6.27.5 wouldn't revert cleanly, > > > > By the way, my HD passed a "smartctl -t long" test without any problems. > > > > Reproduced with 2.6.27.7 with ec.c taken from 2.6.27.4 - after three > minutes of freeze the laptop came back to normal as nothing had > happened.