From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nadim khemir Subject: Re: Git.pm Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:39:47 +0100 Message-ID: <200812071839.48007.nadim@khemir.net> References: <200811191856.44252.nadim@khemir.net> <20081120083446.GF10544@machine.or.cz> <200811232058.11321.nadim@khemir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Dec 07 18:39:55 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L9Nbj-0007Tu-36 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:39:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751066AbYLGRid (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:38:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751250AbYLGRid (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:38:33 -0500 Received: from mail1.perspektivbredband.net ([81.186.254.13]:58428 "EHLO mail1.perspektivbredband.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbYLGRid (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:38:33 -0500 Received: from khemir.net (h51bafc0a.c46-01-06.sta.perspektivbredband.net [81.186.252.10]) by mail1.perspektivbredband.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80878940087 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:38:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from naquadim.khemir.lan (naquadim.khemir.lan [192.168.1.234]) by khemir.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1347812640A7 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 18:38:31 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 In-Reply-To: <200811232058.11321.nadim@khemir.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.2.5-gr0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5-gr0 (2008-06-10) on firewall Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sunday 23 November 2008 20.58.11 nadim khemir wrote: > On Thursday 20 November 2008 09.34.46 you wrote: > My current plan is to: > ... > - tell my fellow perl developers about this (done, so far very good > response) - confer with the people having git related modules (a few) > - gather ideas for what nededs to be changed (not much this far) > ... This http://perlbuzz.com/2008/12/moving-forward-with-git-and-perl.html should take care of waking up the perl community (they are not really sleeping just concentrating on their own perlish world). In a few days, I'll mail all the developers having git related modules and try to get a common strategy (wish us luck with that). Cheers, Nadim.