From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:37:46 +0000 Message-ID: <20081216163746.GA9478@srcf.ucam.org> References: <200812161625.37318.rjw@sisk.pl> <200812161713.08451.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from cavan.codon.org.uk ([93.93.128.6]:40076 "EHLO vavatch.codon.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755519AbYLPQiD (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:38:03 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812161713.08451.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: "Brian J. Murrell" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:13:08PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday, 16 of December 2008, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > Because the hal-driven whitelist allows us to match systems in a more > > > detailed way. If your system is in the s2ram whitelist already and > > > works with it, there shouldn't be any difference. > > > > Unfortunately, Ubuntu in their "wisdom" removed s2ram and claim "s2both" > > supersedes it in that it does both suspend to disk and suspend to ram and > > then suspends, but if your battery dies while suspended you can still > > resume from the suspend to disk. I seem to be missing the original message, but: no, s2ram doesn't exist in Ubuntu because pm-utils handles that role. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org