From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: suspend/resume fails on second attempt in LNXVIDEO:00 Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:13:08 +0100 Message-ID: <200812161713.08451.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200812161625.37318.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Brian J. Murrell" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, 16 of December 2008, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:25:37 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > Because the hal-driven whitelist allows us to match systems in a more > > detailed way. If your system is in the s2ram whitelist already and > > works with it, there shouldn't be any difference. > > Unfortunately, Ubuntu in their "wisdom" removed s2ram and claim "s2both" > supersedes it in that it does both suspend to disk and suspend to ram and > then suspends, but if your battery dies while suspended you can still > resume from the suspend to disk. Hm, this really isn't reasonable. s2both saves the image, which takes quite a lot of time, while s2ram doesn't. Also, s2both is not really ACPI-compliant. > > Still, I was only considering that as a debugging aid in your case, > > because s2ram works in the minimal configuration, while hald doesn't. > > Right. I will give s2both a try and see what happens... no joy. It > fails to even run without the swap device mounted, and my swap device is > not big enough to hibernate to anyway. Damn you Ubuntu. You can compile s2ram from sources, it's not too difficult. > > That's a bit of new information. > > > > What's the list of modules loaded in the minimal configuration? > > Module Size Used by > ext3 130568 1 > jbd 53908 1 ext3 > mbcache 16004 1 ext3 > loop 22540 2 > usb_storage 78656 0 > libusual 30356 1 usb_storage > sd_mod 41240 2 > crc_t10dif 10112 1 sd_mod > sr_mod 21956 0 > cdrom 42272 1 sr_mod > sg 36148 0 > ahci 37260 1 > ata_piix 29700 0 > pata_acpi 12288 0 > ata_generic 13060 0 > libata 176160 4 ahci,ata_piix,pata_acpi,ata_generic > scsi_mod 156948 5 usb_storage,sd_mod,sr_mod,sg,libata > 8139too 31744 0 > 8139cp 27776 0 > mii 13440 2 8139too,8139cp > ehci_hcd 41996 0 > uhci_hcd 30352 0 > usbcore 149392 5 usb_storage,libusual,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd > thermal 23708 0 > processor 49708 3 thermal > fan 12676 0 > fuse 58780 3 Hm. Is that all loaded when you boot with init=/bin/bash (by which I mean the minimal config)? Rafael