From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756049AbYLVXM2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:12:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754924AbYLVXMR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:12:17 -0500 Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk ([195.41.46.235]:42920 "EHLO pfepa.post.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754793AbYLVXMQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:12:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:13:46 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , sfr@canb.auug.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kenchen@google.com, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, David Miller Subject: Re: [patch] powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type Message-ID: <20081222231346.GA4258@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20081222152247.b934ed5b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081222070426.GD29160@elte.hu> <20081222181932.5dd9514e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20081222080341.GA18897@elte.hu> <20081222144319.1bfc0061.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081222230035.GB4074@uranus.ravnborg.org> <49501CC9.5040507@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49501CC9.5040507@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:03:37PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 02:43:19PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > >> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 09:03:41 +0100 > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> > >>> Subject: powerpc: change u64/s64 to a long long integer type > >> > >> > >> There are lots of other architctures that need doing though. > > > > I have missed the introduction. > > Can you explain why? > > > > I have done a bit of sparc hacking lately and was wondering if > > sparc needs something similar. > > > > cd arch/sparc > > git grep u64 | grep -v __u64 | wc -l > > 448 > > > > This should only affect 64-bit architectures. In the sparc-next tree: ls arch/sparc64 ls: arch/sparc64: No such file or directory We have unified sparc and sparc64 so they are in the same arch directory now. This will hit mainline in the upcoming merge window. This has happended over at the sparclinux mailing list as this was sparc/sparc64 specific stuff so no wonder you have not heard about it. Sam