From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:40384 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751335AbYLWVpM (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:45:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:37:34 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Zhu Yi Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "iwl3945: remove iwl-3945-led.[ch]" Message-ID: <20081223213734.GB12572@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20081223_224517_191682_E6D2630E) References: <1230000441-15977-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1230000441-15977-1-git-send-email-yi.zhu@intel.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 10:47:21AM +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > This reverts commit b3489137ec7dabe4531c4344347270857301e209. This > fixes the iwl3945 scan regression reported by Kalle Valo. Would it be best if I just didn't apply that patch in the first place? Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Linux should be at the core linville@tuxdriver.com of your literate lifestyle.