From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: linux-next: usb tree build failure Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:34:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20090105043439.GA4442@kroah.com> References: <20081222113335.667c2d01.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <200812230226.29519.inaky@linux.intel.com> <20081223171726.GB4043@kroah.com> <200812231707.25796.inaky@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:40643 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752227AbZAEEhz (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:37:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812231707.25796.inaky@linux.intel.com> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 05:07:25PM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > On Tuesday 23 December 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 02:26:28AM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > > > On Monday 22 December 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 09:26:43AM -0800, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote: > > > > > On Sunday 21 December 2008, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > > > > > > > ops -- ok, I will. I guess I have to add this in all the similar > > > > > ones, right? > > > > > > > > > > Greg, do you want a new patch series or just another patch on top? > > > > > > > > Just a single replacement patch for when we add this makefile is fine > > > > with me. > > > > > > Hmmm, there was more feedback Sam gave me on Kconfig and Makefiles I > > > added, so at the end the patch touches more files than just this one. > > > Maybe a whole new series will be the way to go. > > > > Ick, I really don't want that. But feel free to respin them yourself, > > and then just send the different patches? It's easy to just replace a > > few individual ones than to drop the whole series and redo it (well on > > my end at least...) > > > > Heck, tell me what to edit and I can edit individual patches quite > > easily as well, I'd rather do that as well :) > > :) -- find them attached, it's just a couple of them that need a respin > (#10 and #27). Thanks, I've now replaced these in my tree and pushed it on out. greg k-h