From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: tree build failure Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:39:45 +1100 Message-ID: <20090116213945.59b9b67f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090116163745.93f4e075.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <1232090749.8870.85.camel@laptop> <20090116090355.GA4305@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__16_Jan_2009_21_39_45_+1100_k5UhYmGEfrxxg97a" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:59032 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754875AbZAPKj4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:39:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090116090355.GA4305@elte.hu> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Fri__16_Jan_2009_21_39_45_+1100_k5UhYmGEfrxxg97a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:03:55 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > That smells like a bad merge somewhere, I just checked -tip and it look= s=20 > > like so: >=20 > yep. I zapped the auto-sched-next branch for now. Glad to be of service. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__16_Jan_2009_21_39_45_+1100_k5UhYmGEfrxxg97a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAklwY/EACgkQjjKRsyhoI8xsOACgswSCpuZ7UPuNefiTUOfoBrbB o7wAnArG8k5U2DCKh78YdxQsKcPw3AoG =r3xE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__16_Jan_2009_21_39_45_+1100_k5UhYmGEfrxxg97a--