From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: linux-next: net tree build failure Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:01:03 +1100 Message-ID: <20090123190103.1420c62f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20090123182847.718fdb85.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20090122.235612.256786187.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__23_Jan_2009_19_01_03_+1100_M.5r5pSr.Mce1gh9" Return-path: Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:39326 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753883AbZAWIBI (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:01:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090122.235612.256786187.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Miller Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@linux-foundation.org --Signature=_Fri__23_Jan_2009_19_01_03_+1100_M.5r5pSr.Mce1gh9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Dave, On Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:56:12 -0800 (PST) David Miller = wrote: > > Does this patch fix it? I can't see any other way to end up > with a multiple definition like that. It confused me as well (one of the defintions is in the bss and one in ro-data). I will give your patch a try later tonight. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Fri__23_Jan_2009_19_01_03_+1100_M.5r5pSr.Mce1gh9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkl5eT8ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8weSQCfeEOKIg2AZUlxeAu95ebt+9w2 0hoAn3lnFNzkZvLDkYzIqTWVVo+FmsfW =eqyO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__23_Jan_2009_19_01_03_+1100_M.5r5pSr.Mce1gh9--