From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1LU55B-0001F6-UI for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:07:52 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:07:43 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Adrian Hunter Subject: Re: Regarding UBI scalability Message-ID: <20090202200743.GF28129@shareable.org> References: <31956721.196931233319535527.JavaMail.weblogic@epml10> <1233567078.7085.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <618F1BB69C6C43C895C260C527C4F159@sisodomain.com> <4986D3F6.5030208@nokia.com> <1233572259.7085.64.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4986D677.3020500@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4986D677.3020500@nokia.com> Cc: Amit Kumar Sharma , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "brij.singh@samsung.com" List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , You might also look at the method LogFS uses. LogFS claims to be scalable and very fast for large flashes already. -- Jamie