From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mads Martin Joergensen Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:34:04 +0000 Subject: Re: Web based moderation system for MLMMJ Message-Id: <20090207133404.GK4240@mmj.dk> List-Id: References: <498C406B.9070200@goirand.fr> In-Reply-To: <498C406B.9070200@goirand.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: mlmmj@mlmmj.org * Thomas Goirand [Feb 07. 2009 14:10]: > Anyway, my question remains... Is the procedure like this: > > - rename moderated with: > mv hash hash.sending That mv is done by mlmmj-send while sending, you should never have to do that. I would suggest you send a mail to a moderated list, go to the LISTDIR and see what it looks like while it's waiting for the moderator to reply. You need exectly the same, but just not send a mail to moderators, but leave the moderation action for the webinterface... > - call the following: > mlmmjsend -L listdir -m hash.sending > > Also, pops to my mind: why should I rename the moderated message? Is it > mandatory? Should the moderation web interface delete the moderated > message with unlink after the call to mlmmjsend? ... and when the webinterface clicks moderate you do the same as if the moderator replied to the mail. Just send a mail to the reply-to address from your webserver. You know how to construct the correct reply-to when you have access to the moderation/ directory. And if you send the mail, then you don't have to do anything else, since that's not needed with mail moderation either. -- Mads Martin Joergensen, http://mmj.dk "Why make things difficult, when it is possible to make them cryptic and totally illogical, with just a little bit more effort?" -- A. P. J.