From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755141AbZBKIPa (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:15:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752885AbZBKIPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:15:22 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:53198 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468AbZBKIPW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 03:15:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:32:17 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Peter Cordes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING fun Message-ID: <20090211083217.GQ14832@one.firstfloor.org> References: <87zlk1yvjk.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20090211042758.GV21351@cordes.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090211042758.GV21351@cordes.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the detailed analysis. It would be probably most productive if you could extract compileable test cases and file them in gcc bugzilla, so that the gcc developers can address these problems. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.