From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757967AbZBKV4k (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:56:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755183AbZBKV4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:56:30 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:57281 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754891AbZBKV4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:56:30 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Hugh Dickins Subject: Re: 2.6.28.4 regression: mmap fails if mlockall used Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:56:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.0 (Linux/2.6.29-rc4-tst; KDE/4.2.0; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Doug Bazarnic , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sami Farin References: <20090208105222.hj7zhcyxyqfjeobt@m.safari.iki.fi> <033401c98c15$c868c100$593a4300$@net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902112256.14988.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 11 February 2009, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Doug Bazarnic wrote: > > I can confirm the mlock.c patch works on 2.6.28.4. 2.6.28.3 works fine. > > This issue happens on both Centos 5.2 x86_64 and RHEL 5.3 x86_64. > > > > Without the mlock.c patch, ntpd fails to start on 2.6.28.4: > > Feb 10 22:03:19 testbox ntpd[4030]: kernel time sync status 0040 > > Feb 10 22:03:19 testbox ntpd[4030]: getaddrinfo: "127.0.0.1" invalid host > > address, ignored > > Feb 10 22:03:19 testbox ntpd[4030]: getaddrinfo: "::1" invalid host address, > > ignored > > Feb 10 22:03:19 testbox ntpd[4030]: getaddrinfo: "127.127.1.0" invalid host > > address, ignored > > Feb 10 22:03:19 testbox ntpd[4030]: Cannot find user `ntp' > > Feb 10 22:03:21 testbox ntpd_initres[4034]: parent died before we finished, > > exiting > > > > Fyi.. gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42) > > > > Thanks to Sami for mentioning ntpd failures, as I was going nuts trying to > > figure out why my ntpd.conf file wasn't working anymore. > > > > Thanks for the patch as well. > > Thanks a lot for testing and confirming: > you should find the fix is in 2.6.28.5, due out maybe tomorrow. > > Rafael, you did already close Bug #12669 - now please cancel my > suggestion that it remain open until the fix has been confirmed ;) Sure, it's going to stay closed. ;-) Rafael