From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qcow2 corruption observed, fixed by reverting old change Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:43:32 -0800 Message-ID: <20090213184332.GU27684@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20090211070049.GA27821@shareable.org> <49955681.9070301@suse.de> <20090213162336.GI18471@shareable.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Marc Bevand , Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Jamie Lokier Return-path: Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:42552 "EHLO sequoia.sous-sol.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750848AbZBMSoW (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:44:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090213162336.GI18471@shareable.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org) wrote: > no reason to believe kvm-83 is "stable", but there's no reason to > believe any other version of KVM is especially stable either - there's > no stabilising bug fix only branch that I'm aware of. There's ad-hoc one w/out formal releases. But...never been closer ;-) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/28179 thanks, -chris From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY311-0003Jc-Nn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LY30y-0003Cm-1x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:55 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55791 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LY30x-0003CP-N8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:51 -0500 Received: from sous-sol.org ([216.99.217.87]:37714 helo=sequoia.sous-sol.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LY30w-0003yC-NX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:43:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:43:32 -0800 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: qcow2 corruption observed, fixed by reverting old change Message-ID: <20090213184332.GU27684@sequoia.sous-sol.org> References: <20090211070049.GA27821@shareable.org> <49955681.9070301@suse.de> <20090213162336.GI18471@shareable.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090213162336.GI18471@shareable.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Marc Bevand , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org * Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org) wrote: > no reason to believe kvm-83 is "stable", but there's no reason to > believe any other version of KVM is especially stable either - there's > no stabilising bug fix only branch that I'm aware of. There's ad-hoc one w/out formal releases. But...never been closer ;-) http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/28179 thanks, -chris