From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [68.230.241.45] (helo=fed1rmmtao101.cox.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lf5YS-000694-Tz for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 05:51:36 +0100 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090305044712.BWOO27308.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:47:12 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.230.63.214]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id PGnB1b0054dMFYL03GnB2F; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:47:13 -0500 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=rLqa6MAm0WMA:10 a=DWb1u0IjorAA:10 a=ZH8p2r9Qk4fmts7GxFAA:9 a=H2yTlRM4XSXAixZAnYcA:7 a=o4q_C2KyWunYOx-InGDeVNvZ-hUA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=ppAow9BjEhOe3PUD:21 a=FlwKsdKpY510RjgY:21 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:47:11 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Message-ID: <20090305044711.GE26343@smtp.west.cox.net> References: <1236182004-4523-1-git-send-email-openembedded@haerwu.biz> <1236182004-4523-70-git-send-email-openembedded@haerwu.biz> <49AF4FBD.1010209@dls.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <49AF4FBD.1010209@dls.net> Organization: Embedded Alley Solutions, Inc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: Re: I got the point - did everyone one else? [was: Re: [PATCH 70/70]...] X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 04:51:56 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:06:21PM -0600, Mike (mwester) wrote: > 70 patches on the list???? > > I presume somebody is making a point with this. Yes, ok, _I_ get it - > reading the emails on the list using a cell phone and gprs connection > and tiny screen REALLY REALLY Reallly SUCKS when the mailing list also > used as a patch review list. Actually, the point is the opposite. Spamming the list where everyone is means bugs get caught and working-but-incorrect things get pointed out. > Got it. > > Deleted the lot; I can't read them on a cell phone, even if I had the > patience to struggle through 120+ emails on THIS list alone today! > > Let's split this list. I can't be the only person trying to keep up on > a poor connection via a cell phone. Nothing personal, really, but when I'm on a limited connection I simply ignore certain lists. -- Tom Rini