From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:35:08 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] at91sam9263ek add dcc support with at91sam9263ek_dcc_config In-Reply-To: <20090308233359.9E610832E8B8@gemini.denx.de> References: <1236089265-24598-1-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-2-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-3-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-4-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-5-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-6-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-7-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <1236089265-24598-8-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> <20090308233359.9E610832E8B8@gemini.denx.de> Message-ID: <20090309083508.GD24237@game.jcrosoft.org> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 00:33 Mon 09 Mar , Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > In message <1236089265-24598-8-git-send-email-plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> you wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > --- > > Makefile | 11 +++++++++++ > > include/configs/at91sam9263ek.h | 2 ++ > > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile > > index 784af52..50ce78e 100644 > > --- a/Makefile > > +++ b/Makefile > > @@ -2687,6 +2687,8 @@ at91sam9261ek_config : unconfig > > at91sam9263ek_nandflash_config \ > > at91sam9263ek_dataflash_config \ > > at91sam9263ek_dataflash_cs0_config \ > > +at91sam9263ek_dcc_multi_config \ > > +at91sam9263ek_dcc_config \ > > at91sam9263ek_wdt_config \ > > at91sam9263ek_config : unconfig > > NAK. NAK. NAK. > > As explained before, this makes no sense. Why could we not have DCC > support with any of the other options? we can but I wish not to add 1000 of config, just one or two to build it and test it on each release > > Also, you are adding more and more cruft to the Makefile. This is not > acceptable. > > Finally, there should be some commit message that explains what you > are doing. For example, you should at least give a minimal > explanation what DCC is and why we might want to add this.... I've add DCC is used a serial over ICE so it will replace the serial port of the board Best Regards, J.