From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from 128-177-27-249.ip.openhosting.com ([128.177.27.249]:37462 "EHLO jmalinen.user.openhosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754532AbZCJRDX (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:03:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:03:04 +0200 From: Jouni Malinen To: "Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx)" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] ath9k: Virtual interfaces and radios Message-ID: <20090310170304.GA18634@jm.kir.nu> (sfid-20090310_180327_357164_9E7CF7A6) References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:43:31AM -0700, Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx) wrote: > I agree with Florian Fainelli. As a user of ath9k I would love to see > these patches make it into the driver. I've not seen technical > complaints of your patches. Time to rebase and get them included? Or > at least some testing reports? They went already in into wireless-testing git tree. I would certainly be interested in see test reports if people are doing some experiments with the new code. There are still number of areas that can benefit from optimizations and combinations that do not probably work yet, so it will be useful to know if these show up in a configuration that someone would like to use. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jouni Malinen Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 19:03:04 +0200 Subject: [ath9k-devel] [PATCH 00/15] ath9k: Virtual interfaces and radios In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090310170304.GA18634@jm.kir.nu> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:43:31AM -0700, Stephen Gutknecht (hilltx) wrote: > I agree with Florian Fainelli. As a user of ath9k I would love to see > these patches make it into the driver. I've not seen technical > complaints of your patches. Time to rebase and get them included? Or > at least some testing reports? They went already in into wireless-testing git tree. I would certainly be interested in see test reports if people are doing some experiments with the new code. There are still number of areas that can benefit from optimizations and combinations that do not probably work yet, so it will be useful to know if these show up in a configuration that someone would like to use. -- Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA