From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754578AbZCLEl1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:41:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754036AbZCLElQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:41:16 -0400 Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:51105 "EHLO fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753442AbZCLElO (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:41:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:49 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 Message-Id: <20090312133949.130b20ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090312034647.GA23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090312095247.bf338fe8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090312034647.GA23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> Organization: FUJITSU Co. LTD. X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-12 09:52:47]: > I've tested so far by > > Creating two cgroups and then > > a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch > test softlimit ? > b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G > c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G > d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0 > > More comments in induvidual patches. > Then, 1. what's the number of active threads ? 2. what's the number of cpus ? 3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ? 4. what's the zone configuration ? 5. what's arch ? 6. what's amount of total memory ? 7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ? 8. Do you tested *this* version ? Thanks, -Kame > -- > Balbir > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail138.messagelabs.com (mail138.messagelabs.com [216.82.249.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 162476B003D for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:41:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp ([10.0.50.72]) by fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp (Fujitsu Gateway) with ESMTP id n2C4fBro032431 for (envelope-from kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com); Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:41:12 +0900 Received: from smail (m2 [127.0.0.1]) by outgoing.m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912B45DE62 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:41:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp [10.0.50.92]) by m2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C5245DD79 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:41:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071F5E1800A for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:41:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from m108.s.css.fujitsu.com (m108.s.css.fujitsu.com [10.249.87.108]) by s2.gw.fujitsu.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A533EE38005 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:41:10 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:49 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 Message-Id: <20090312133949.130b20ed.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20090312034647.GA23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> References: <20090312095247.bf338fe8.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090312034647.GA23583@balbir.in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" , "kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" List-ID: On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530 Balbir Singh wrote: > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki [2009-03-12 09:52:47]: > I've tested so far by > > Creating two cgroups and then > > a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch > test softlimit ? > b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G > c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G > d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0 > > More comments in induvidual patches. > Then, 1. what's the number of active threads ? 2. what's the number of cpus ? 3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ? 4. what's the zone configuration ? 5. what's arch ? 6. what's amount of total memory ? 7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ? 8. Do you tested *this* version ? Thanks, -Kame > -- > Balbir > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org