All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] PCI: beef up pci_do_scan_bus()
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:22:26 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312232226.GD31042@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B8D2F4.1030206@jp.fujitsu.com>

Hello Kenji-san,

* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Alex Chiang wrote:
> > We have a nice interface for re-scanning a PCI bus which will
> > discover newly added devices, add them to the device tree, and
> > enable them properly.
> > 
> > Ensure that the bridge resources are properly sized and assigned
> > during the rescan.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/pci/hotplug-pci.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
> >  1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug-pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug-pci.c
> > index 4d4a644..33ab2d2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug-pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug-pci.c
> > @@ -6,13 +6,21 @@
> >  
> >  unsigned int __devinit pci_do_scan_bus(struct pci_bus *bus)
> >  {
> > -	unsigned int max;
> > +	unsigned int max, pass;
> > +	struct pci_dev *dev;
> >  
> >  	max = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * Make the discovered devices available.
> > -	 */
> > +	for (pass=0; pass < 2; pass++)
> > +		list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) {
> > +			if (dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE ||
> > +			    dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS)
> > +				if (pass && dev->subordinate)
> > +					pci_bus_size_bridges(dev->subordinate);
> > +		}
> > +
> > +	pci_bus_assign_resources(bus);
> > +	pci_enable_bridges(bus);
> >  	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> 
> The "for (pass=0; pass <2; pass++)" loop doesn't look necessary.

Yes, I don't know why I had it in there originally. I can remove
that.

> And I'm worrying that your change have some bad effect to the
> existing user of pci_do_scan_bus(). Did you confirm that?

I hadn't gotten around to verifying/fixing existing callers of
pci_do_scan_bus yet. I was focusing on the core first.

There aren't too many callers, but unfortunately, I don't have
any hardware that actually uses the existing drivers.

I seem to recall that your machines support shpchp. Would you
mind testing this patch and telling me if your machine still
behaves properly?

I looked at shpchp_configure_device and I think that simply
scanning the device's parent bus should work.

Thanks.

/ac

diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c b/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
index aa315e5..7e8457b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/shpchp_pci.c
@@ -110,11 +110,7 @@ int __ref shpchp_configure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	num = pci_scan_slot(parent, PCI_DEVFN(p_slot->device, 0));
-	if (num == 0) {
-		ctrl_err(ctrl, "No new device found\n");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
+	pci_do_scan_bus(parent);
 
 	for (fn = 0; fn < 8; fn++) {
 		dev = pci_get_slot(parent, PCI_DEVFN(p_slot->device, fn));
@@ -126,40 +122,10 @@ int __ref shpchp_configure_device(struct slot *p_slot)
 			pci_dev_put(dev);
 			continue;
 		}
-		if ((dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) ||
-				(dev->hdr_type == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS)) {
-			/* Find an unused bus number for the new bridge */
-			struct pci_bus *child;
-			unsigned char busnr, start = parent->secondary;
-			unsigned char end = parent->subordinate;
-			for (busnr = start; busnr <= end; busnr++) {
-				if (!pci_find_bus(pci_domain_nr(parent),
-							busnr))
-					break;
-			}
-			if (busnr > end) {
-				ctrl_err(ctrl,
-					 "No free bus for hot-added bridge\n");
-				pci_dev_put(dev);
-				continue;
-			}
-			child = pci_add_new_bus(parent, dev, busnr);
-			if (!child) {
-				ctrl_err(ctrl, "Cannot add new bus for %s\n",
-					 pci_name(dev));
-				pci_dev_put(dev);
-				continue;
-			}
-			child->subordinate = pci_do_scan_bus(child);
-			pci_bus_size_bridges(child);
-		}
 		program_fw_provided_values(dev);
 		pci_dev_put(dev);
 	}
 
-	pci_bus_assign_resources(parent);
-	pci_bus_add_devices(parent);
-	pci_enable_bridges(parent);
 	return 0;
 }
 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-09  5:48 [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:48 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] PCI: pci_is_root_bus helper Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:48 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] PCI: don't scan existing devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:48 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] PCI: pci_scan_slot() returns newly found devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:48 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] PCI: always scan child buses Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] PCI: beef up pci_do_scan_bus() Alex Chiang
2009-03-12  9:16   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-12 23:22     ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-03-13  9:11       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-15 16:48         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18  8:29           ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-18 20:39             ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  2:15               ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Alex Chiang
2009-03-09 18:52   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-10 22:37     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-11  4:08       ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] PCI Hotplug: restore fakephp interface with complete reimplementation Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] PCI Hotplug: rename legacy_fakephp to fakephp Alex Chiang
2009-03-09  5:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] PCI Hotplug: schedule fakephp for feature removal Alex Chiang
2009-03-09 18:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-09 19:30   ` Vegard Nossum
2009-03-09 19:52     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-09 20:28       ` Vegard Nossum
2009-03-09 20:37         ` Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090312232226.GD31042@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.