From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: [JGIT PATCH 0/5] RevWalk fixes for UNINTERESTING Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:26 +0100 Message-ID: <200903132100.26527.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> References: <1236910062-18476-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 13 21:02:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LiDa1-0000fu-F5 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:02:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753057AbZCMUAg (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:00:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752286AbZCMUAg (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:00:36 -0400 Received: from mail.dewire.com ([83.140.172.130]:15138 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751549AbZCMUAf (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:00:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927E6139A475; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino.dewire.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8mRlFYQD2sd; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from sleipner.localnet (unknown [10.9.0.3]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA650139A474; Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:27 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.11.1 (Linux/2.6.27-12-generic; KDE/4.2.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1236910062-18476-1-git-send-email-spearce@spearce.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: fredag 13 mars 2009 03:07:37 skrev "Shawn O. Pearce" : > Today I uncovered some ugly cases with "jgit rev-list B ^A", where > some commits reachable from A were still being output, even though > we asked that they be excluded. How about a test suite to prove this is better than before? -- robin