All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org, shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:15:00 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090320041500.GB26595@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49C1FE8A.9000401@jp.fujitsu.com>

* Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>:
> Alex Chiang wrote:
>> We're getting close to the new merge window, and I _think_ this
>> patch series is ready for consideration. Notably:
>>
>> 	- multiple rescans/removes of devices with and without bridges
>> 	- verified that resource allocation after multiple remove/rescan
>> 	  cycles is the same as what we had during initial boot
>> 	- fixes the complete suckage of fakephp (that I created)
>> 	- doesn't affect existing hotplug drivers
>> 	- tested on x86 and ia64 platforms
>>
>> Please review, and consider testing. For testing ease, you can pull
>> from my git branch:
>>
>> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/achiang/pci-hotplug.git
>> 	branch 'test-20090318' is what you want
>>
>
> I got the following oops when I did
>
> # echo 1 > remove
>
> on the bridge device.
>
> [ 6639.239164] =============================================
> [ 6639.239191] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
> [ 6639.239212] 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1
> [ 6639.239227] ---------------------------------------------
> [ 6639.239243] events/8/60 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 6639.239252]  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257fc0>] flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 6639.239252]  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] other info that might help us debug this:
> [ 6639.239252] 3 locks held by events/8/60:
> [ 6639.239252]  #0:  (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252]  #1:  (&ss->work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80257648>] run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.239252]  #2:  (pci_remove_rescan_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff803c05b9>] remove_callback+0x29/0x80
> [ 6639.239252]
> [ 6639.239252] stack backtrace:
> [ 6639.239252] Pid: 60, comm: events/8 Not tainted 2.6.29-rc8-kk #1
> [ 6639.239252] Call Trace:
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff8026dfcd>] validate_chain+0xb7d/0x1260
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff8026eade>] __lock_acquire+0x42e/0xa40
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff8026f148>] lock_acquire+0x58/0x80
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff80257fc0>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff8025800d>] flush_workqueue+0x4d/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff80257fc0>] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0xa0
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff80258070>] flush_scheduled_work+0x10/0x20
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffffa0158065>] e1000_remove+0x55/0xfe [e1000e]
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff8033ee60>] ? sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x0/0x50
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff803bf7a2>] pci_device_remove+0x32/0x70
> [ 6639.239252]  [<ffffffff80441409>] __device_release_driver+0x59/0x90
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8044153b>] device_release_driver+0x2b/0x40
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff80441036>] bus_remove_device+0xa6/0x120
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8043dacb>] device_del+0x12b/0x190
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8043db56>] device_unregister+0x26/0x70
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff803ba529>] pci_stop_dev+0x49/0x60
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff803ba670>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x40/0xc0
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff803ba71d>] pci_remove_behind_bridge+0x2d/0x50
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff803ba64e>] pci_remove_bus_device+0x1e/0xc0
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff803c05c8>] remove_callback+0x38/0x80
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8033ee7f>] sysfs_schedule_callback_work+0x1f/0x50
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8025769a>] run_workqueue+0x15a/0x230
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff80257648>] ? run_workqueue+0x108/0x230
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8025846f>] worker_thread+0x9f/0x100
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8025bce0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff802583d0>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x100
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8025b89d>] kthread+0x4d/0x80
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8020d4ba>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8020cebc>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8025b850>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
> [ 6639.241006]  [<ffffffff8020d4b0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
> [ 6639.283330] e1000e 0000:40:00.0: PCI INT A disabled
> [ 6639.324332] e1000e 0000:40:00.1: PCI INT B disabled
> [ 6639.325031] aer 0000:2f:04.0:pcie22: unloading service driver aer

pci_device_remove() calls the driver's ->remove method directly;
it shouldn't be messing around with that sysfs callback.

Does this only happen with e1000e devices? Or does it happen on
any bridge device?

I am stumped; I've never seen this locking issue before...

Will continue to look, thanks.

/ac


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-20  4:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-18 22:39 [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] PCI: pci_is_root_bus helper Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] PCI: don't scan existing devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] PCI: pci_scan_slot() returns newly found devices Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] PCI: always scan child buses Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] PCI: do not initialize bridges more than once Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:39 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] PCI: Introduce pci_rescan_bus() Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:27   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:05     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 17:42       ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 17:49         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-03-19 18:09           ` Greg KH
2009-03-19  9:29   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:34   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:11     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 22:55       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 23:21         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../remove Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:43   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 16:06     ` Greg KH
2009-03-19 16:30     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 14:17   ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 16:41     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 20:43       ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-19 20:46         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 23:19       ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-20  3:53         ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] PCI: Introduce /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../rescan Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] PCI Hotplug: restore fakephp interface with complete reimplementation Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  9:45   ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-19 17:00     ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-19 19:24     ` Trent Piepho
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] PCI Hotplug: rename legacy_fakephp to fakephp Alex Chiang
2009-03-18 22:40 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] PCI Hotplug: schedule fakephp for feature removal Alex Chiang
2009-03-19  8:12 ` [PATCH v4 00/12] PCI core learns hotplug Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:07   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  4:15   ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-03-19 14:09 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2009-03-19 17:13   ` Alex Chiang
2009-03-20  5:16   ` Alex Chiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090320041500.GB26595@ldl.fc.hp.com \
    --to=achiang@hp.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shimada-yxb@necst.nec.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.