From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757101AbZCWAcp (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:32:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753999AbZCWAcf (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:32:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:56414 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753028AbZCWAce (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:32:34 -0400 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:23:33 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Akinobu Mita , mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 1/2] mm: introduce debug_kmap_atomic Message-Id: <20090322172333.7d7fde92.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090314131555.GB17727@elte.hu> References: <20090311143317.GA22244@localhost.localdomain> <20090314041948.GA3697@localhost.localdomain> <20090314131555.GB17727@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 14:15:55 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Akinobu Mita wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:39:31AM +0000, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > x86: unify kmap_atomic_pfn() and iomap_atomic_prot_pfn(), fix > > > > > > Impact: build fix > > > > > > Move kmap_atomic_prot_pfn() to iomap_32.c. It is used on all 32-bit > > > kernels, while highmem_32.c is only built on highmem kernels. > > > > Thanks for fixing that. > > > > > ( Note: the debug_kmap_atomic_prot() check is removed for now, that > > > problem is handled via another patch. ) > > > > The patches are now sitting in -mmotm now. For -tip, here are the rebased > > patches for the debug_kmap_atomic_prot() check. > > Due to the other-arch changes it's better to keep them in -mm i > guess. Once the current batch goes out to linux-next (in the > next few days) Andrew could pick up the two -tip patches you > posted here. I really don't know what's going on here.