From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robin H. Johnson" Subject: Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2009 07:03:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20090406T140124Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> References: <20090405T001239Z@curie.orbis-terrarum.net> <20090405035453.GB12927@vidovic> <20090405070412.GB869@curie-int> <20090405190213.GA12929@vidovic> <20090405225954.GA18730@vidovic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SgT04PEqo/+yUDw3" To: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 06 16:08:09 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LqpRa-0002XD-O8 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:04:59 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755384AbZDFOD2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:03:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754995AbZDFOD2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:03:28 -0400 Received: from b01.ext.isohunt.com ([208.71.112.51]:59340 "EHLO mail.isohunt.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755059AbZDFOD1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:03:27 -0400 Received: (qmail 11364 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2009 14:03:24 -0000 Received: from tsi-static.orbis-terrarum.net (HELO curie.orbis-terrarum.net) (76.10.188.108) (smtp-auth username robbat2@isohunt.com, mechanism login) by mail.isohunt.com (qpsmtpd/0.33-dev on beta01) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA; Mon, 06 Apr 2009 14:03:24 +0000 Received: (qmail 6257 invoked by uid 10000); 6 Apr 2009 07:03:20 -0700 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: --SgT04PEqo/+yUDw3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I haven't read all this morning submissions to the thread yet, but I wanted to make two posts before I leave on a trip (in ~20 minutes), and I'll be back late on Thursday. On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 09:29:04AM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > To me, this is a non-issue (if the content of these objects are > > secret, then why are they here at all on a public server?), but I > > think there were discussions here about it (can't find the right > > keywords to dig the archives though), and other people may think > > differently. > Guess who was involved in that discussion... > I may allow you to pull certain branches directly from my own PC through= =20 > the git native protocol. That doesn't mean you have direct access to=20 > the whole of any of the packs I have on my disk. If the native rsync protocol is allowed to the repo, then that argument is moot. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux Developer & Infra Guy E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --SgT04PEqo/+yUDw3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks - The text below is a digital signature. If it doesn't make any sense to you, ignore it. iEYEARECAAYFAknaC6gACgkQPpIsIjIzwixcCwCg8+EYv3iqXrulL8tgWtixaRS0 0hUAnRvqjo8/7vaJ2hn7MCGcpRgoA1AQ =sVGX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SgT04PEqo/+yUDw3--