From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.198.249] (helo=rv-out-0708.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuAXx-0005BQ-8a for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:13:26 +0200 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so39207rvf.0 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oIiVehnIfFSf1ytmizeK9f/iYaACqtz5D/+W9si7f+0=; b=elchesFCsNPYwxo8fTwwXTM8qdNAh78nntB9QH/k56y6h1WRxEY1d8AVMsCfu32+7a kyrFmCSPwNXs7CxbiCATd5a7+iomD5vQi4hp3K5tsieTJEj28rEqGlQEeD8MVootj8G8 zuGIw5HEVK56mkbbf4g9Kjt+nAGR7EfeoTy98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=kI2F5cU70GL/lN91GrHfW6l4D9vKcz52PkHOECQFwK6Kna5tvbxcrSTjZjaq3zMcYd qYla9ha1UvVwIp15ANPMLIEwA2fPzDISp1djNZ16gavxdvSYAol6+LbSb0UrZDXnDAoO mGxchax9f7FJfGXPkXtl7/T5ahOuCfNS1Uc7c= Received: by 10.141.48.6 with SMTP id a6mr444165rvk.36.1239822572272; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gmail.com (adsl-71-146-24-121.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.24.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm327679rvb.17.2009.04.15.12.09.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:09:13 -0700 From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Message-ID: <20090415190913.GA29623@gmail.com> References: <200904151633.49146.khimov@altell.ru> <1239798960-3586-1-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> <1239798960-3586-2-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> <1239798960-3586-3-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1239798960-3586-3-git-send-email-khimov@altell.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.198.249 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Cc: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:13:29 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote: > Taken from http://bugs.openembedded.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1728 > --- > .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb > index 13579f9..db13a45 100644 > --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb > +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb > @@ -63,4 +63,16 @@ do_stage () { > cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/linux ${STAGING_INCDIR}/ > cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm ${STAGING_INCDIR}/ > cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-generic ${STAGING_INCDIR}/ > + if [ "${ARCH}" == "x86_64" ]; then > + cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-x86_64 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/ > + cp -pfLR ${STAGE_TEMP}${includedir}/asm-i386 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/ > + fi > +} > + > +do_stage_append_multilib () { > + mkdir ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB} > + ln -s ../linux ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/linux > + ln -s ../asm ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm > + ln -s ../asm-generic ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm-generic > + ln -s ../asm-i386 ${STAGING_INCDIR}/${TARGET_SYS_MULTILIB}/asm-i386 > } is there any reason not to use sanitized header like we do in do_install even for do_stage > -- > 1.6.2.1 > > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel