From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [209.85.200.172] (helo=wf-out-1314.google.com) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LuLpy-0000hw-EN for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:20:09 +0200 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so273061wfa.3 for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:12:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=RVfp7t7+C4KVgCaeaU1SQwfPkb1sjnDrBLWUhWiYJxo=; b=jTEGEWegf4+vfgAesMiDbUVM+maWhxsjMboavpK3Z4f7hJmYgTtufOOgwUnxn7Iar7 S6OMLGPQwnE1FPvPevKwkYYigYfQVdiNMDytbKXkIBUKOQEmn9dQnVxqHurdrvWrBlbQ NRQiEWfjRjsy7L9ZZ6MYjUIUY2nQrsgIWq/qE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=vGGzImy4eflbng8dCLModCFlZysZfOJWoAFCPbZQXnBRoK0ob3p/C2RTDmnJRnTop1 WW6rHzKSY8s7fevGkmas4qZ3rsX2cl7LyAmmYBfabGsp4Sbg92nbzVbV9WmPDVAPQ1n/ Gz5c7IoDn0pg91T/9xF0bdO99sYGvNx/eUGq0= Received: by 10.142.172.12 with SMTP id u12mr1713702wfe.288.1239865969982; Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from morpheus.localnet (adsl-71-146-24-121.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [71.146.24.121]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 24sm2834556wfc.17.2009.04.16.00.12.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:12:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Khem Raj To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:12:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-11-generic; KDE/4.2.2; x86_64; ; ) References: <200904151633.49146.khimov@altell.ru> <20090415190913.GA29623@gmail.com> <200904152325.47053.khimov@altell.ru> In-Reply-To: <200904152325.47053.khimov@altell.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200904160012.46743.raj.khem@gmail.com> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 209.85.200.172 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: raj.khem@gmail.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] linux-libc-headers 2.6.23: fix amd64 headers X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 07:20:35 -0000 X-Groupsio-MsgNum: 9421 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2378005.xchOPfrTZM"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart2378005.xchOPfrTZM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 15 April 2009 12:25:46 pm Roman I Khimov wrote: > On Wednesday 15 April 2009 23:09:13 Khem Raj wrote: > > On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote: > > > --- a/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb > > > +++ b/recipes/linux-libc-headers/linux-libc-headers_2.6.23.bb > > > @@ -63,4 +63,16 @@ do_stage () { > > > > is there any reason not to use sanitized header like we do in do_install > > even for do_stage >=20 > I think this is the way to go for newer kernels and it can be generalized= in=20 > some .inc for future. This approach is used now in=20 > linux-libc-headers_2.6.29.bb, but 2.6.23 historically uses this kind of=20 > do_stage and I don't think we should change that now. OK. On that note can you test if your stuff works with 2.6.29 kernel header= s ? >=20 > BTW, we have locally a patch modifying kernel.bbclass to also use=20 > headers_install in kernel_do_stage for newer kernels. One of many things = I=20 > still need to prepare and push. yeah I have always wanted something like that. However its required pretty = early=20 in the build phase thats why we have linux-libc-headers >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-devel mailing list > Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel >=20 =2D-=20 Khem Raj --nextPart2378005.xchOPfrTZM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAknm2msACgkQHnJKy6V6em5ZLgCfYbF0DaIOjiavzPEGu6Ou1GRd cwAAn2Cl+O6c8LiVO/X0BP3Yc3sKl5cg =N6jH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2378005.xchOPfrTZM--