On Wednesday 15 April 2009 10:28:57 pm Roman I Khimov wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 April 2009 23:25:12 Khem Raj wrote:
> > On (15/04/09 16:35), Roman I Khimov wrote:
> > > ---
> > >  .../binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch              |   25
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++ recipes/binutils/binutils_2.18.bb                  |
> > >    2 +-
> > >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644
> > > recipes/binutils/binutils-2.18/binutils-x86_64_i386_biarch.patch
> >
> > Looks ok. Could you also make this on later versions of toolchains.
> > I am not worried about the older ones.
> 
> Works good with 2.19 and 2.19.1, but not 2.18.50.0.7.

FWIW 2.18.50.0.7 is default binutils for some distros (angstrom)

> Not sure it makes sense 
> to adapt it there and add more patch versions to tree. See attached.
> 

-- 
Khem Raj