From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756365AbZDPJ0k (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:26:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754766AbZDPJ0b (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:26:31 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:58489 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754600AbZDPJ0a (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:26:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:25:31 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Joe Perches Cc: Yinghai Lu , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , Suresh Siddha , "Eric W. Biederman" , Rusty Russell , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] irq: make set_affinity to return status -v2 Message-ID: <20090416092531.GM9813@elte.hu> References: <49E68C41.4020801@kernel.org> <49E68CBC.8090507@kernel.org> <20090416090826.GG9813@elte.hu> <1239873477.14053.9.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1239873477.14053.9.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Joe Perches wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 11:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > arch/alpha/kernel/sys_dp264.c | 8 +++- > > > arch/alpha/kernel/sys_titan.c | 4 +- > > > arch/arm/common/gic.c | 4 +- > > > arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c | 4 +- > > > arch/ia64/hp/sim/hpsim_irq.c | 3 + > > > arch/ia64/kernel/iosapic.c | 10 +++-- > > > arch/ia64/kernel/msi_ia64.c | 16 +++++--- > > > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 4 +- > > > arch/ia64/sn/kernel/msi_sn.c | 8 ++-- > > > arch/mips/cavium-octeon/octeon-irq.c | 8 +++- > > > arch/mips/include/asm/irq.h | 2 - > > > arch/mips/kernel/irq-gic.c | 5 +- > > > arch/mips/mti-malta/malta-smtc.c | 4 +- > > > arch/mips/sibyte/bcm1480/irq.c | 8 ++-- > > > arch/mips/sibyte/sb1250/irq.c | 8 ++-- > > > arch/parisc/kernel/irq.c | 6 ++- > > > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/xics.c | 12 +++--- > > > arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c | 4 +- > > > arch/sparc/kernel/irq_64.c | 12 ++++-- > > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > drivers/parisc/iosapic.c | 6 ++- > > > drivers/xen/events.c | 12 +++--- > > > include/linux/irq.h | 2 - > > > 23 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-) > [] > > There is one omission: this should be Cc:-ed to > > linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, because it affects all architectures. > > How is one supposed to know this tidbit? by hanging around on lkml long enough? :) If you think about automating it into scripts/get_maintainer.pl - maybe you could add a trigger that if a change affects more than a single arch/* architecture then linux-arch should be generated too for the Cc: list? It would be nice to have. Ingo