From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755190AbZDQEb5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:31:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751086AbZDQEbs (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:31:48 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:33433 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750891AbZDQEbr (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2009 00:31:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:15:14 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Ryo Tsuruta Cc: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com, menage@google.com, balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, agk@sourceware.org, axboe@kernel.dk, baramsori72@gmail.com, chlunde@ping.uio.no, dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, dpshah@google.com, eric.rannaud@gmail.com, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, taka@valinux.co.jp, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com, matt@bluehost.com, dradford@bluehost.com, ngupta@google.com, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, roberto@unbit.it, s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] bio-cgroup controller Message-Id: <20090416211514.038c5e91.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20090417.104432.193700511.ryov@valinux.co.jp> References: <20090416152937.b2188370.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090417092040.1c832c69.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20090416174428.6bb5da21.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20090417.104432.193700511.ryov@valinux.co.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:44:32 +0900 (JST) Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > > > Hmm, how about iotrack-cgroup ? > > > > > > > Well. blockio_cgroup has the same character count and is more specific. > > How about blkio_cgroup ? Sounds good.