From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [83.222.23.61] (helo=relay1.mail.masterhost.ru) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LugKC-0008VM-Hi for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:09:20 +0200 Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([84.17.11.114] helo=mate.hex) by relay1.mail.masterhost.ru with esmtp envelope from authenticated with rik@osrc.info message id 1LugGL-000FKp-Eh for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:05:17 +0400 From: Roman I Khimov Organization: Altell Ltd. To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 09:05:14 +0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 References: <200904151633.49146.khimov@altell.ru> <20090416221140.GQ17629@smtp.west.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20090416221140.GQ17629@smtp.west.cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200904170905.15115.khimov@altell.ru> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 83.222.23.61 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: khimov@altell.ru X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on serenity X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET, RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:14:11 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on linuxtogo.org) Subject: Re: [RFC] AMD64 and multilib support X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 05:09:28 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 17 April 2009 02:11:40 Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 04:33:48PM +0400, Roman I Khimov wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > This patch series (will follow in replies) tries to bring in AMD64/x86_64 > > support into OE. This required some intrusive toolchain fixes that I want > > to post here for review and feedback as I think (or rather know ;)) I > > might have broken something along the way. > > Have you done a build of meta-toolchain as well? Not yet. gcc-cross was the main target. [adding to TODO]