From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Thibault Subject: Re: RE: Xen 4.0 Feature Requests Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:11:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20090422081159.GA5688@const.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C95FCEAC5E18@FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <14D9C9E2ED61ED41BC3B37ACDF4E880002B40FAFC4FB@heavy-vm03.heavy.org.uk> <20090422011430.GZ12200@const.famille.thibault.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Dirk Utterback Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Tim Moore , Stephen Spector , "xen-users@lists.xensource.com" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Dirk Utterback, le Wed 22 Apr 2009 01:08:26 -0700, a =E9crit : > Dirk Utterback, le Tue 21 Apr 2009 18:08:41 -0700, a =E9crit : > > =A0 It would be very nice if PCI passthrough for all VT machines = (not just > for > > VT-d boxes) is available. >=20 > Unsafe PCI passthrough is available. =A0Safe PCI passthrough just c= an not > happen without VT-d. >=20 >=20 > =A0=A0 I agree PCI passthrough without VT-d has drawbacks. I just want = to achieve > good performance but not security. Are you saying it is available now? Sure, just use pciback and assign the device to a domU. Samuel