All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6.30-rc2] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures: [sr0] Add. Sense: Logical block address out of range, sector 0
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:49:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090422144904.407df635.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090421015234.GA7014@hexapodia.org>

On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:52:34 -0700
Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> wrote:

> I'm running 2.6.30-rc2-00446-ga939b96 on a Dell E4300 with a
> upgraded-to-Jaunty-mostly Ubuntu install.  Using 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.1,
> I've successfully burned a dozen CDRs, but since updating to .30-rc1
> I've noticed intermittent failures to burn CDRs using wodim at the Gnome
> desktop.  (Switching back to .29.1 makes wodim reliable again.)  There
> have been a few different failure modes, but all of them seem to be
> associated with these messages in dmesg, which I haven't seen before:
> 
> [  360.740810] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
> [  360.740816] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Sense Key : Illegal Request [current] 
> [  360.740820] sr 1:0:0:0: [sr0] Add. Sense: Logical block address out of range
> [  360.740826] end_request: I/O error, dev sr0, sector 0
> [  360.740830] Buffer I/O error on device sr0, logical block 0
> 
> (repeated a few dozen times).
> 
> I haven't been able to reproduce these messages running wodim at the
> console (after "/etc/init.d/gdm stop") so I suspect there's some
> interference between wodim and Gnome's desktop device detection.
> 
> I've seen the following behavior running wodim under gnome:
> 
> 1. wodim blocked in D state for >10 minutes, system showing interactive
> lagginess.  Unfortunately I've not been able to reproduce this to get
> wchan info, but I *think* it was showing blk_execute_rq.
> 
> 2. running wodim triggers DID_OK messages, but wodim seems to be able to
> complete writing the ISO and the resulting CDR reads OK.
> 
> 3. running wodim triggers DID_OK messages, and wodim fails:  (but I
> think this is just due to the media having been partially written by a
> previous iteration of wodim.)
> 
> % wodim ubuntu-9.04-rc-desktop-amd64.iso
> wodim: No write mode specified.
> wodim: Asuming -tao mode.
> wodim: Future versions of wodim may have different drive dependent defaults.
> wodim: Operation not permitted. Warning: Cannot raise RLIMIT_MEMLOCK limits.Device was not specified. Trying to find an appropriate drive...
> Looking for a CD-R drive to store 698.17 MiB...
> Detected CD-R drive: /dev/cdrw
> Using /dev/cdrom of unknown capabilities
> Device type    : Removable CD-ROM
> Version        : 5
> Response Format: 2
> Capabilities   : 
> Vendor_info    : 'TSSTcorp'
> Identification : 'DVD+-RW TS-U633A'
> Revision       : 'D200'
> Device seems to be: Generic mmc2 DVD-R/DVD-RW.
> Using generic SCSI-3/mmc   CD-R/CD-RW driver (mmc_cdr).
> Driver flags   : MMC-3 SWABAUDIO BURNFREE 
> Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R16 RAW/R96P RAW/R96R
> Speed set to 4234 KB/s
> Starting to write CD/DVD at speed  24.0 in real TAO mode for single session.
> Last chance to quit, starting real write in    0 seconds. Operation starts.
> Errno: 5 (Input/output error), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no error
> CDB:  2A 00 FF FF FF FF 00 00 1F 00
> status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
> Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 21 00 00 00
> Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0
> Sense Code: 0x21 Qual 0x00 (logical block address out of range) Fru 0x0
> Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) 
> cmd finished after 0.003s timeout 40s
> write track data: error after 0 bytes
> wodim: The current problem looks like a buffer underrun.
> wodim: It looks like 'driveropts=burnfree' does not work for this drive.
> wodim: Please report.
> wodim: Make sure that you are root, enable DMA and check your HW/OS set up.
> Errno: 5 (Input/output error), close track/session scsi sendcmd: no error
> CDB:  5B 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION)
> Sense Bytes: 70 00 05 00 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 00 72 03 00 00
> Sense Key: 0x5 Illegal Request, Segment 0
> Sense Code: 0x72 Qual 0x03 (session fixation error - incomplete track in session) Fru 0x0
> Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) 
> cmd finished after 0.340s timeout 480s
> cmd finished after 0.340s timeout 480s
> wodim: Cannot fixate disk.
> 
> I'm running "wodim ubuntu-9.04-rc-desktop-amd64.iso" as a regular user
> with group write permissions to /dev/sr0.
> 
> I've seen /lib/udev/vol_id running *after* wodim has opened the device,
> so I wonder if there's some race condition there.
> 
> This is with udev 140-2 and wodim 9:1.1.9-1ubuntu1.  .config and
> additional information available at:
> 
> http://web.hexapodia.org/~adi/sysinfo/1240274989_cvpe4300_2.6.30-rc2-00446-ga939b96/
> 

Is seems unreasonably hard (to me) to work out what low-level driver is
in use when we see bug reports like this.

Trolling your dmesg
(http://web.hexapodia.org/~adi/sysinfo/1240274989_cvpe4300_2.6.30-rc2-00446-ga939b96/dmesg.out)
I see 

[    2.184016] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 300)
[    2.198709] ata2.00: ATAPI: TSSTcorp DVD+/-RW TS-U633A, D200, max UDMA/100, ATAPI AN
[    2.198774] ata2.00: applying bridge limits
[    2.214107] ata2.00: configured for UDMA/100
[    2.230305] scsi 1:0:0:0: CD-ROM            TSSTcorp DVD+-RW TS-U633A D200 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[    2.548015] ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
[    2.884014] ata6: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)

so I guess that it's serial ATA, at least.

But which lower-level ata driver is being used under that?

[    0.717960] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: version 3.0
[    0.717968] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: PCI INT D -> GSI 19 (level, low) -> IRQ 19
[    0.718057] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: irq 27 for MSI/MSI-X
[    0.718097] ahci: SSS flag set, parallel bus scan disabled
[    0.718176] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 4 ports 3 Gbps 0x33 impl RAID mode
[    0.718236] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: flags: 64bit ncq sntf stag pm led clo pmp pio slum part ems 
[    0.718298] ahci 0000:00:1f.2: setting latency timer to 64

ahci, I guess.


Probably this is all perfectly obvious to the initiated, but for those
whose life revolves around telling the initiated about their bugs, this
is all unreasonably hard :(

Oh well, let's tentatively assume that we have a post-2.6.29 regression
in the libata ahci driver.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-22 21:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-21  1:52 [2.6.30-rc2] CD-R: wodim intermittent failures: [sr0] Add. Sense: Logical block address out of range, sector 0 Andy Isaacson
2009-04-22 21:49 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-04-23  6:46   ` Robert Hancock
2009-04-23  7:07     ` Andy Isaacson
2009-05-12 21:52       ` Andy Isaacson
2009-05-12 23:23         ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-13  1:00           ` Andy Isaacson
2009-05-13  1:08             ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-13  1:08               ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-13  2:27               ` Andy Isaacson
2009-04-23 14:48 Joerg Schilling
2009-04-27 19:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2009-05-13  1:52 ` Kyle Moffett
2009-05-13 11:50   ` Joerg Schilling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090422144904.407df635.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.