From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] Software receive packet steering Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: <20090423072925.GO4593@kernel.dk> References: <20090422.022120.211323498.davem@davemloft.net> <20090423065830.GN4593@kernel.dk> <20090423.002524.32556359.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hawk@diku.dk, therbert@google.com, shemminger@vyatta.com, dada1@cosmosbay.com, andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se, jens.laas@ITS.UU.SE, hawk@comx.dk To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([93.163.65.50]:49352 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756108AbZDWH31 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:29:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090423.002524.32556359.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 23 2009, David Miller wrote: > From: Jens Axboe > Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:58:30 +0200 > > > On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, David Miller wrote: > >> > >>> One thought I keep coming back to is the hack the block layer > >>> is using right now. It remembers which CPU a block I/O request > >>> comes in on, and it makes sure the completion runs on that > >>> cpu too. > > > > Hack?! :-) > > I meant hack in the most positive sense :) Duly noted ;-) -- Jens Axboe