From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yuji Shimada Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] remove saving/restoring method in Xend. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:57:48 +0900 Message-ID: <20090423115659.917F.27C06F64@necst.nec.co.jp> References: <20090422111600.32AA.27C06F64@necst.nec.co.jp> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA34172EC1DA5@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA34172EC1DA5@LONPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Pratt Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Keir Fraser , Kouya Shimura , Ross Philipson List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:38:13 +0100 Ian Pratt wrote: > Does it not make sense to have pciback do the reset too? I think I've seen draft patches from Ross Philipson to move the reset into pciback -- they may even be checked in to the xenbits.xen.org/xenclient tree. Hi, Ian Of course, it is better to reset in pciback. So Ross's patches seems to be nice. But as the future freeze is announced for Xen 3.4, I think these patches are too big to merge with it. I think it is better to merge these patches after Xen 3.4 is released. My patches are sufficient enough to make Xen 3.4 robust in resetting/ restoring devices. Thanks, -- Yuji Shimada