From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lixom.net (lixom.net [66.141.50.11]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F351DDFAF for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2009 03:50:45 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:52:10 -0500 From: Olof Johansson To: Mike Wolf Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: adjust oprofile_cpu_type Message-ID: <20090423175210.GB4732@lixom.net> References: <1240443612.27209.2.camel@mx3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1240443612.27209.2.camel@mx3> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:40:12PM -0500, Mike Wolf wrote: > Resending. the patch was munged last time. > > > Oprofile is changing the naming it is using for the compatibility modes. > Instead of having compat-power, oprofile will go to family naming > convention and use compat-v. Currently only compat-v1 will be > defined. Compat V1 of what? powerpc64? IBM powerpc64 PMC? The performance monitors are not architected, to give them a version number without vendor information seems weird. Also, doesn't this break compatibility with existing userspace tools? -Olof