From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] OMAP24xx/25xx clock: init osc_ck, sys_ck internal lists early Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:55:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20090423235527.GM22457@atomide.com> References: <20090414182039.22344.49790.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090414182324.22344.71159.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090421195421.GB29943@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090423075337.GA20250@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20090423180031.GD22457@atomide.com> <20090423222612.GA6095@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:55507 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751096AbZDWX4I (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:56:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090423222612.GA6095@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Paul Walmsley , linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [090423 15:26]: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 11:00:31AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Paul Walmsley [090423 01:35]: > > > Hello Russell, > > > > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:01:29PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > > > > The patch also renames clk_init_one() to clk_preinit() to > > > > > distinguish its function from clk_init() and the individual struct clk > > > > > init functions. > > > > > > > > That's rather unnecessary. 'clk_init_one' is already unique. In the > > > > long run, it's clk_init that needs to go. > > > > > > Even if clk_init() were to disappear, the struct clk .init function > > > pointer would still be present. clk->init() performs a very different > > > kind of initialization than clk_init_one(). > > > > I'm OK doing the rename in this fix. The original naming can cause > > confusion while reading the code. > > Well I'm not, and I want to discuss it some more. And I'm sending Linus > a pull request tonight, so I'm dropping the OMAP stuff from that. OK. Paul, can you please separate out the rename part into a separate patch so we only have a minimal fix & then repost it here? That way we'll get the necessary fixes in and you guys can schedule other changes for next merge window. Thanks, Tony