From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754852AbZDZITb (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:19:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753200AbZDZISi (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:18:38 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f163.google.com ([209.85.218.163]:49995 "EHLO mail-bw0-f163.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751864AbZDZISf (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Apr 2009 04:18:35 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=xteu1DsGkIGm5vrQTpC3RGPut7MHvP+XHyUzD0nYDFnDTlTRD8Y4zQH5w5qpMhJ1cB PKE2ooDharhahYFcon9dYL+ylxDfQtaq+rlYUHoxndfvaeDgmobZfVhVVySTKznMbmxG JUvIIuGGUVII/7XRLsigchdmhoK9OcK4rrGvU= Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:18:25 +0200 From: Jarek Poplawski To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Eric Dumazet , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mackerras , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Evgeniy Polyakov , David Miller , kaber@trash.net, jeff.chua.linux@gmail.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, jengelh@medozas.de, r000n@r000n.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: iptables no lockdep is needed.. Message-ID: <20090426081825.GA2755@ami.dom.local> References: <20090421111541.228e977a@nehalam> <20090421193924.GA24404@elte.hu> <20090421143927.52d7d89d@nehalam> <20090423210938.1501507b@nehalam> <49F146FF.5050200@cosmosbay.com> <20090424091839.6e13ebec@nehalam> <49F22465.80305@gmail.com> <20090425133052.4cb711f5@nehalam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090425133052.4cb711f5@nehalam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:30:52PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Epilogue due to master Jarek. Lockdep carest not about the locking > doth bestowed. Therefore no keys are needed. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Very nice! I guess this Shakespeare guy Will sign off this all too. ;-) Thanks, Jarek P. > > --- > net/netfilter/x_tables.c | 9 ++------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > --- a/net/netfilter/x_tables.c 2009-04-25 13:25:48.115026283 -0700 > +++ b/net/netfilter/x_tables.c 2009-04-25 13:26:15.646215635 -0700 > @@ -1145,14 +1145,9 @@ static int __init xt_init(void) > { > unsigned int i; > int rv; > - static struct lock_class_key xt_lock_key[NR_CPUS]; > > - for_each_possible_cpu(i) { > - rwlock_t *lock = &per_cpu(xt_info_locks, i); > - > - rwlock_init(lock); > - lockdep_set_class(lock, xt_lock_key+i); > - } > + for_each_possible_cpu(i) > + rwlock_init(&per_cpu(xt_info_locks, i)); > > xt = kmalloc(sizeof(struct xt_af) * NFPROTO_NUMPROTO, GFP_KERNEL); > if (!xt)