From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ryo Tsuruta Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] io-throttle documentation Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:45:33 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20090427.194533.183037823.ryov__17890.4070090086$1240833509$gmane$org@valinux.co.jp> References: <20090417102539.GA16838@linux> <20090420.183815.226804723.ryov@valinux.co.jp> <20090420150052.GC13307@linux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090420150052.GC13307@linux> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: righi.andrea-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org Cc: randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, menage-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, chlunde-om2ZC0WAoZIXWF+eFR7m5Q@public.gmane.org, eric.rannaud-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, balbir-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, fernando-gVGce1chcLdL9jVzuh4AOg@public.gmane.org, dradford-cT2on/YLNlBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, agk-9JcytcrH/bA+uJoB2kUjGw@public.gmane.org, subrata-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org, containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org, matt-cT2on/YLNlBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org, roberto-5KDOxZqKugI@public.gmane.org, ngupta-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Hi Andrea, From: Andrea Righi Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] io-throttle documentation Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 17:00:53 +0200 > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 06:38:15PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > > > > Implementing bio-cgroup functionality as pure infrastructure framework > > > instead of a cgroup subsystem would remove all this oddity and > > > complexity. > > > > > > For example, the actual functionality that I need for the io-throttle > > > controller is just an interface to set and get the cgroup owner of a > > > page. I think it should be the same also for other potential users of > > > bio-cgroup. > > > > > > So, what about implementing the bio-cgroup functionality as cgroup "page > > > tracking" infrastructure and provide the following interfaces: > > > > > > /* > > > * Encode the cgrp->css.id in page_group->flags > > > */ > > > void set_cgroup_page_owner(struct page *page, struct cgroup *cgrp); > > > > > > /* > > > * Returns the cgroup owner of a page, decoding the cgroup id from > > > * page_cgroup->flags. > > > */ > > > struct cgroup *get_cgroup_page_owner(struct page *page); > > > > > > This also wouldn't increase the size of page_cgroup because we can > > > encode the cgroup id in the unused bits of page_cgroup->flags, as > > > originally suggested by Kame. > > > > > > And I think it could be used also by dm-ioband, even if it's not a > > > cgroup-based subsystem... but I may be wrong. Ryo what's your opinion? I've come up with an idea to coexist blkio-cgroup and io-throttle. blkio-cgroup provides a function to get a cgroup with the specified ID. /* Should be called under rcu_read_lock() */ struct cgroup *blkio_cgroup_lookup(int id) { struct cgroup *cgrp; struct cgroup_subsys_state *css; if (blkio_cgroup_disabled()) return NULL; css = css_lookup(&blkio_cgroup_subsys, id); if (!css) return NULL; cgrp = css->cgroup; return cgrp; } Then io-throttle can get a struct iothrottle which belongs to the cgroup by using the above function. static struct iothrottle *iothrottle_lookup(int id) { struct cgroup *grp; struct iothrottle *iot; ... grp = blkio_cgroup_lookup(id); if (!grp) return NULL iot = cgroup_to_iothrottle(grp); ... } What do you think about this way? Thanks, Ryo Tsuruta