From: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] do_wait: do take security_task_wait() into account
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 13:31:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090430203154.77621FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Oleg Nesterov's message of Wednesday, 29 April 2009 18:01:23 +0200 <20090429160123.GA4591@redhat.com>
I'm pretty sure this was just an unintended change when we did the do_wait
reorganization in 2.6.27. Nobody noticed since the SELinux policy bugs
that made that error diagnosis relevant were fixed a long time before.
Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-30 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 22:30 Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-28 23:33 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 16:01 ` [PATCH] do_wait: do take security_task_wait() into account Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 20:31 ` Roland McGrath [this message]
2009-04-30 22:51 ` James Morris
2009-05-06 11:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 0:29 ` Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait James Morris
2009-04-29 6:58 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 12:20 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 13:16 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 13:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 13:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2009-04-29 15:39 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 10:02 ` David Howells
2009-04-29 10:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 11:17 ` David Howells
2009-04-29 11:55 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 12:42 ` David Howells
2009-04-29 12:45 ` David Howells
2009-04-29 13:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 0:37 ` James Morris
2009-04-29 13:18 ` Stephen Smalley
2009-04-29 13:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 14:02 ` ptrace: selinux_bprm_committed_creds: simplify __wake_up_parent() code and s/parent/real_parent/ Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-29 14:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-04-30 22:44 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-03 20:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-04 17:38 ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-30 0:38 ` James Morris
2009-04-30 22:38 ` Roland McGrath
2009-04-29 14:48 ` Q: selinux_bprm_committed_creds() && signals/do_wait Alan Cox
2009-05-01 0:02 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-03 20:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-05-04 17:34 ` Roland McGrath
2009-05-01 0:44 ` David Howells
2009-05-01 0:50 ` Roland McGrath
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090430203154.77621FC3BF@magilla.sf.frob.com \
--to=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.