From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755174AbZEBKK2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 06:10:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752216AbZEBKKP (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 06:10:15 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:53288 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751541AbZEBKKN (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 May 2009 06:10:13 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:14:05 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Alexander Beregalov , Kernel Testers List , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs Message-ID: <20090502101405.GA6145@fancy-poultry.org> Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: private site User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19+20090405 (GNU/Linux) X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19cgp2K9Ko3pvHs3Q2/qyDAw8E8TAQA2ZAnuqk V4dZi3Wnxj8XpH5VIwvNtdjWkuHgMY1MWV+mafU7R/smfZKSXE uvz1NilNy2sgzRg9kfiPTNRxtqflRFh Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 01.05.2009, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 > xfs_db> frag > actual 23805, ideal 22890, fragmentation factor 3.84% > # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 > /mnt/c start inode=0 > ino=158 > extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=158 > > then it hangs I can't confirm this here on my systems: liesel:~ # uname -a Linux liesel 2.6.30-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 2 11:49:13 CEST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux liesel:~ # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 xfs_db> frag actual 42974, ideal 42842, fragmentation factor 0.31% xfs_db> quit liesel:~ # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 /home start inode=0 ino=248755507 ino=248755507 already fully defragmented. ino=536871160 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=536871160 ino=536875693 extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=536875693 ino=615920545 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920545 ino=615920557 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920557 ino=1092324584 extents before:4 after:1 DONE ino=1092324584 liesel:~ # From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n42AABEt050864 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 05:10:12 -0500 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BFD5B146A2C6 for ; Sat, 2 May 2009 03:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id TnD20fOdXDtxCVwL for ; Sat, 02 May 2009 03:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:14:05 +0200 From: Heinz Diehl Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs Message-ID: <20090502101405.GA6145@fancy-poultry.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Reply-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Kernel Testers List , Alexander Beregalov , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 01.05.2009, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 > xfs_db> frag > actual 23805, ideal 22890, fragmentation factor 3.84% > # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 > /mnt/c start inode=0 > ino=158 > extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=158 > > then it hangs I can't confirm this here on my systems: liesel:~ # uname -a Linux liesel 2.6.30-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 2 11:49:13 CEST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux liesel:~ # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 xfs_db> frag actual 42974, ideal 42842, fragmentation factor 0.31% xfs_db> quit liesel:~ # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 /home start inode=0 ino=248755507 ino=248755507 already fully defragmented. ino=536871160 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=536871160 ino=536875693 extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=536875693 ino=615920545 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920545 ino=615920557 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920557 ino=1092324584 extents before:4 after:1 DONE ino=1092324584 liesel:~ # _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Heinz Diehl Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc4: xfs_fsr hangs Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:14:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20090502101405.GA6145@fancy-poultry.org> References: Reply-To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: kernel-testers-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: Alexander Beregalov , Kernel Testers List , xfs-VZNHf3L845pBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org On 01.05.2009, Alexander Beregalov wrote: > # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 > xfs_db> frag > actual 23805, ideal 22890, fragmentation factor 3.84% > # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 > /mnt/c start inode=0 > ino=158 > extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=158 > > then it hangs I can't confirm this here on my systems: liesel:~ # uname -a Linux liesel 2.6.30-rc4 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat May 2 11:49:13 CEST 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux liesel:~ # xfs_db -r /dev/sdc1 xfs_db> frag actual 42974, ideal 42842, fragmentation factor 0.31% xfs_db> quit liesel:~ # xfs_fsr -v /dev/sdc1 /home start inode=0 ino=248755507 ino=248755507 already fully defragmented. ino=536871160 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=536871160 ino=536875693 extents before:3 after:1 DONE ino=536875693 ino=615920545 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920545 ino=615920557 extents before:2 after:1 DONE ino=615920557 ino=1092324584 extents before:4 after:1 DONE ino=1092324584 liesel:~ #