From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753942AbZEFGZi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 02:25:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751310AbZEFGZ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 02:25:28 -0400 Received: from e7.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.137]:41989 "EHLO e7.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133AbZEFGZ2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 02:25:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:11:18 +0530 From: Balbir Singh To: Andrew Morton Cc: Vivek Goyal , dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, agk@redhat.com, paolo.valente@unimore.it, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp, jmoyer@redhat.com, fchecconi@gmail.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, righi.andrea@gmail.com Subject: Re: IO scheduler based IO Controller V2 Message-ID: <20090506034118.GC4416@balbir.in.ibm.com> Reply-To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <1241553525-28095-1-git-send-email-vgoyal@redhat.com> <20090505132441.1705bfad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090505132441.1705bfad.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrew Morton [2009-05-05 13:24:41]: > On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:58:27 -0400 > Vivek Goyal wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4. > > ... > > Currently primarily two other IO controller proposals are out there. > > > > dm-ioband > > --------- > > This patch set is from Ryo Tsuruta from valinux. > > ... > > IO-throttling > > ------------- > > This patch set is from Andrea Righi provides max bandwidth controller. > > I'm thinking we need to lock you guys in a room and come back in 15 minutes. > > Seriously, how are we to resolve this? We could lock me in a room and > cmoe back in 15 days, but there's no reason to believe that I'd emerge > with the best answer. > We are planning an IO mini-summit prior to the kernel summit (hopefully we'll all be able to attend and decide). -- Balbir