From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] mm: Add __GFP_NO_OOM_KILL flag Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 10:16:51 +0900 Message-ID: <20090508101651.aa4d513d.kamezawa.hiroyu__48660.4521204301$1241745734$gmane$org@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <20090507154502.a7f51dd9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <200905080111.31273.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200905080111.31273.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk, David Rientjes , Andrew Morton , fengguang.wu@intel.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 May 2009 01:11:30 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > + for_each_populated_zone(zone) > + zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED); > + for_each_populated_zone(zone) > + zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_OOM_LOCKED); > + Isn't it better to make above 2 be functions and move to mm/oom_kill.c ? Thanks, -Kame