From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756750AbZEJViY (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:38:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756792AbZEJVgS (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:36:18 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:40048 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756706AbZEJVgQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:36:16 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:36:11 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox Cc: Joe Perches , Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: MAINTAINER email address style? Message-ID: <20090510213611.GC30393@elf.ucw.cz> References: <1240003652.31116.44.camel@localhost> <20090407081312.GH1408@ucw.cz> <1240415689.21848.19.camel@localhost> <20090422185916.GA3864@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090422120510.cc17e470.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1240430185.21848.103.camel@localhost> <20090422203005.GA467@elf.ucw.cz> <1240557233.6735.240.camel@localhost> <1241987200.3877.9.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> <20090510222441.0fc3fc5b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090510222441.0fc3fc5b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun 2009-05-10 22:24:41, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > P: Len Brown now , Pavel Machek , Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > L: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > > > S: Supported > > > > Is there a consensus/majority opinion on this? > > > > Should names and email addresses in MAINTAINERS be integrated? > > Should it stay as-is or be changed to: > > Please leave it alone or it becomes a total PITA to parse. Currently it is PITA to use... which is IMNSHO worse. <> is standard email notation, and I do not think it is in any way hard to parse. Plus... I believe most uses _are_ manual. Parsers can be fixed, humans can not. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html