From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756610AbZEJV3Q (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:29:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752711AbZEJV3A (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:29:00 -0400 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:60315 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751966AbZEJV3A (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2009 17:29:00 -0400 Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:24:41 +0100 From: Alan Cox To: Joe Perches Cc: Pavel Machek , Andrew Morton , Sam Ravnborg , randy.dunlap@oracle.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RFC: MAINTAINER email address style? Message-ID: <20090510222441.0fc3fc5b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <1241987200.3877.9.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> References: <1239167872-8179-1-git-send-email-joe@perches.com> <20090417134711.ba0f03e7.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <1240003652.31116.44.camel@localhost> <20090407081312.GH1408@ucw.cz> <1240415689.21848.19.camel@localhost> <20090422185916.GA3864@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090422120510.cc17e470.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1240430185.21848.103.camel@localhost> <20090422203005.GA467@elf.ucw.cz> <1240557233.6735.240.camel@localhost> <1241987200.3877.9.camel@Joe-AcerAspire> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > P: Len Brown now , Pavel Machek , Rafael J. Wysocki > > > L: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org > > > S: Supported > > Is there a consensus/majority opinion on this? > > Should names and email addresses in MAINTAINERS be integrated? > Should it stay as-is or be changed to: Please leave it alone or it becomes a total PITA to parse.