From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:25:11 -0600 Message-ID: <20090511162511.GG8112@parisc-linux.org> References: <20090511161442.3e9d9cb9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A081002.4050802@in.ibm.com> <20090511115233.GB8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A081437.7000409@in.ibm.com> <20090511122135.GC8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:59111 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752245AbZEKQZL (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 May 2009 12:25:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Sachin Sant Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg , Nick Piggin , chinang.ma@intel.com On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:55PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with > SLUB on the same machine. Is it 100% reproducable with SLQB? Our errors were fairly hard to tickle on demand. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.parisc-linux.org (palinux.external.hp.com [192.25.206.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.parisc-linux.org", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A81CDDDEE for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 02:25:17 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:25:11 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Sachin Sant Subject: Re: Next May 11 : BUG during scsi initialization Message-ID: <20090511162511.GG8112@parisc-linux.org> References: <20090511161442.3e9d9cb9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4A081002.4050802@in.ibm.com> <20090511115233.GB8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A081437.7000409@in.ibm.com> <20090511122135.GC8112@parisc-linux.org> <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4A08502B.9040001@in.ibm.com> Cc: Nick Piggin , Stephen Rothwell , linux-scsi , chinang.ma@intel.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Pekka Enberg , linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 09:49:55PM +0530, Sachin Sant wrote: > Yeah so the problem seems to be with SLQB. I was able to boot Next 11 with > SLUB on the same machine. Is it 100% reproducable with SLQB? Our errors were fairly hard to tickle on demand. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."