From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:51:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20090513095127.308b00e7@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> References: <20090511222702.352192505@arndb.de> <200905112238.55404.arnd@arndb.de> <20090512090602.65722342@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <200905121123.21436.arnd@arndb.de> <20090513033027.GA13193@cynthia.pants.nu> <20090513043409.GA13577@cynthia.pants.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090513043409.GA13577@cynthia.pants.nu> Sender: linux-m68k-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brad Boyer Cc: Michael Schmitz , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, takata@linux-m32r.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org > > If it doesn't interfere with plain PIO mode, fine. > > I agree. There definitely needs to still be support for IDE ports that > don't have DMA capability. There is - it's just if the platform doesn't implement the dma_* APIs you get a problem. Alan