All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>, Alex Tomas <bzzz@sun.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More ext4 acl/xattr corruption - 4th occurence now
Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:48:58 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090515231858.GA5454@kulgan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090514213314.GN5146@kulgan>

On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 07:03:14AM +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:23:25PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 06:32:45AM +0930, Kevin Shanahan wrote:
> > > Okay, so now I've booted into 2.6.29.3 + check_block_validity patch +
> > > short circuit i_cached_extent patch, mounted the fs without
> > > nodelalloc. I was able to run the full exchange backup without
> > > triggering the check_block_validity error.
> > 
> > Great!
> > 
> > So here's the final fix (it replaces the short circuit i_cached_extent
> > patch) which I plan to push to Linus.  It should be much less of a
> > performance hit than simply short-circuiting i_cached_extent...
> > 
> > Thanks so much for helping to find track this down!!!  If ever someone
> > deserved an "Ext4 Baker Street Irregulars" T-shirt, it would be
> > you....
> 
> Hehe, no problem. Will do the final testing shortly (ran out of time
> this morning, users are back on the system now). Just one little
> correction to your patch below:
> 
> > commit 039ed7a483fdcb2dbbc29f00cd0d74c101ab14c5
> > Author: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> > Date:   Thu May 14 17:09:37 2009 -0400
> > 
> >     ext4: Fix race in ext4_inode_info.i_cached_extent
> >     
> >     If one CPU is reading from a file while another CPU is writing to the
> >     same file different locations, there is nothing protecting the
> >     i_cached_extent structure from being used and updated at the same
> >     time.  This could potentially cause the wrong location on disk to be
> >     read or written to, including potentially causing the corruption of
> >     the block group descriptors and/or inode table.
> >     
> >     Many thanks to Ken Shannah for helping to track down this problem.
>                      ^^^^^^^^^^^

Tested-by: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@ucwb.org.au>

Yes, this patch seems to have fixed the issue. I ran my "exchange
backup to samba share" test on 2.6.29.3 + check_block_validity patch +
the fix race patch with no problems.

Cheers,
Kevin.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-15 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-13  6:26 More ext4 acl/xattr corruption - 4th occurence now Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-13 23:56 ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14  4:40 ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 11:07   ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14 11:17     ` Manish Katiyar
2009-05-14 12:30       ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 13:25     ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14 14:07       ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 14:30         ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14 15:44           ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 21:07             ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14 21:08               ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 16:12           ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 21:02             ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-14 21:23               ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-14 21:33                 ` Kevin Shanahan
2009-05-15 23:18                   ` Kevin Shanahan [this message]
2009-05-15  1:21                 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-15 12:50                   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-15 12:58                     ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-15 15:24                       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-15 16:27                         ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-15  4:55                 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-15 10:11                   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-15 13:07                   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-19 10:00                 ` Thierry Vignaud
2009-05-19 11:36                   ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-19 12:01                     ` Alex Tomas
2009-05-19 15:04                       ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-19 15:16                         ` Alex Tomas
2009-05-19 15:18                         ` Thierry Vignaud
2009-05-15  3:57             ` Alex Tomas
2009-05-15  4:58   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2009-05-15 10:27     ` Theodore Tso
2009-05-18  2:14       ` [PATCH] ext4: Add a comprehensive block validity check to ext4_get_blocks() (Was: More ext4 acl/xattr corruption - 4th occurence now) Theodore Tso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090515231858.GA5454@kulgan \
    --to=kmshanah@ucwb.org.au \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=bzzz@sun.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.